🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is pursuing damages valued at $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This move represents a clear warning by the Kremlin against plans to utilize immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days regarding a proposal to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that title of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has threatened reciprocal measures, including seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. It has previously stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such assets can be identified," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that when you do all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."